Andrusyszyn, M.A. (1990). Faculty evaluation: A closer look at peer evaluation. Nurse Education Today, 10, 410-414.

Arden, E. (1989). Who should judge the faculty? College Board Review, 152, 36-39.

Armstrong, P.B. (1994). Deprivatizing the classroom. ADE Bulletin, 107, 13-19.

Arreola, R. A. (1995). Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

Barnett, C. W., & Matthews, H. W. (1998). Current procedures used to evaluate teaching in schools of pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 62 (4), 388-91.

Bernstein, D. J. (1996). A departmental system for balancing the development and evaluation of college teaching: A commentary on Cavanagh. Innovative Higher Education, 20 (4), 241-47.

Blake, V. M., & Dinham, S. M. (1988). Teaching guidebook: An introduction to some basics. ED 301 106.

Bode, R. K., & Menges, R. J. (1997). Feedback seeking and receiving by college and university faculty. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24-28).

Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Instructional Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Braskamp, L. A., & Others. (1982). Faculty uses of evaluation information. ED 218 308.

Bergman, J. (1980). Peer evaluation of university faculty: A monograph. College Student Journal, 14 (3), 1-21.

Brent, R. F., & Richard M. (1997). It takes one to know one. Chemical Engineering Education (CEE), 31 (1), 32-33.

Cavanagh, R. R. (1996). Formative and summative evaluation in the faculty peer review of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 20 (4), 235-40.

Ceci, S. J., & Peter, D. P. (1982). Peer review: A study of reliability. Change, 14 (6), 44-48.

Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective Faculty Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Centra, J. Froh, R. C., Gray, P. J., & Lambert, L. M. (1987). A guide to evaluating teaching for promotion and tenure. (Diamond, R. M., Ed.) Center for Instructional Development, Syracuse University. Littleton, MA: Copley.

Chism, N. (1999). Peer Review of Teaching. A Sourcebook. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

Cohen, P. A., McKeachie, W. J. (1980). The role of colleagues in the evaluation of college teaching. Improving College and University Teaching, 28 (4), 147-54.

Cosser, M. (1998). Towards the design of a system of peer review of teaching for the advancement of the individual within the university. Higher Education, 35, 143-62.

Crase, D. R., & Crase, D. (1995). Peer assessment in higher education: Practices and perceptions. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 87 (2), 51-58.

Diamond, N. A., & Others. (1983). Improving your lecturing. Revised. Paper identified by the Task Force on Establishing a National Clearinghouse of Materials Developed for Teaching Assistant (TA) Training. ED 285 498.

Diamond, R. M. (1999). Aligning Faculty Rewards with Institutional Mission. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

Dienst, E. R. (1981). Evaluation by colleagues. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (65th, Los Angeles, CA, April 13-17). ED 209 341.

Dinham, S. M. (1987). Between academe and professional practice: Initial reflections on analyzing the role of professional practice in higher education. Paper presented at the Western Regional Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture. ED 289 398.

Dombeck, M. T. (1986). Faculty Peer Review in a Group Setting. Nursing Outlook, 34 (4), 188-92.

Doyle, J. R., & Green, R. H. (1994). Self and peer appraisal in higher education. Higher Education, 28 (2), 241-64.

Ellis, R. (1993). The management of quality in the University of Ulster. Higher Education, 25 (3), 239-57.

Feldman, K. A. (1989). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teacher themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (neural) observers. Research in Higher Education, 30 (2), 137-94.

Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Goodwin, S. S., & Others. (1983). Effective classroom questioning. Paper identified by the Task Force on Establishing a National Clearinghouse of Materials Developed for Teaching Assistant (TA) Training. ED 285 497.

Gould, C. (1991). Converting faculty assessment into faculty development: The director of composition's responsibility to probationary faculty. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (42nd, Boston, MA, March 21-23).

Gunn, B. (1982). Evaluating faculty performance: A holistic approach. Journal of the College and University Personnel Association, 34 (4), 23-30.

Hays, R. G. (1990). Round-robin peer evaluations require candid assessments. Journalism Educator, 44 (4), 72-74.

Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (1998).The course portfolio. Washington, DC: AAHE.

Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (1995). From idea to prototype: The peer review of teaching. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

Hutchings, P. (1996). Making teaching community property: A menu for peer collaboration and peer review. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

Hutchings, P. (1996). The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues and prospects. Innovative Higher Education, 20 (4), 221-34.

Keig, L. W., & Waggoner, M. D. (1995). Peer review of teaching: Improving college instruction through formative assessment. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6 (3), 51-83.

Kronk, A. K., & Shipka, T. A. (1980). Evaluation of Faculty in Higher Education: A Handbook for Faculty Leaders. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1995). A multidimensional model for peer evaluation of teaching effectiveness. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6 (3), 95-113.

Langsam, D. M., & Dubois P. L. (1996). Can nightmares become sweet dreams? Peer review in the wake of a systemwide administrative mandate. Innovative Higher Education, 20 (4), 249-59.

Ludwick, R., & Others. (1998). Documenting the scholarship of clinical teaching through peer review. Nurse Educator, 23 (6), 17-20.

Malik, D. J. (1996). Peer review of teaching: External review of course content. Innovative Higher Education, 20 (4), 277-86.

Marshall, R. (1996). Peer evaluation of instruction. Academe, 82, 64-6.

Martsolf, D., Dieckman, B., & Heiss, M.A. (1998). Cultural factors related to the peer review of teaching. Nursing Connections, Fall issue.

Martsolf, D. S., & Others. (1999). Peer review of teaching: Instituting a program in a college of nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 38 (7), 326-32.

Mason, T. R. (1981). Assessing faculty productivity: An issue for decentralization. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research (21st, Minneapolis, MN, May 17-20).

McKeachie, W. J. (1987). Can evaluating instruction improve teaching? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 31, 3-7.

Menges, R. J. (1991). Why hasn't peer evaluation of college teaching caught on? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

Mignon, C., & Langsam, D. (1999). Peer review and post-tenure review. Innovative Higher Education, 24 (1), 49-59.

Morehead, J. W., & Shedd, P. J. (1997). Utilizing summative evaluation through external peer review of teaching. Innovative Higher Education. 22 (1), 37-44.

Muchinsky, P. M. (1995). Peer review of teaching: lessons learned from military and industrial research on peer assessment. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6 (3),17-30.

Mundy, V., & Grabau, L. J. (1999). Planning for peer review of teaching. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 28, 31-36.

Murray, J. P. (1997). Successful faculty development and evaluation: The complete teaching portfolio. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report N.8. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.

Narang, H. (1992). Evaluating faculty teaching: A proposal. ED 349 906.

Neumann, R. (1994). Valuing quality teaching through recognition of context specific skills. Australian Universities' Review, 37 (1), 8-13.

O'Neil, C. and Wright, A. (1993). Recording Teaching Accomplishment. (4th ed.). Halifax, NS: Dahousie University.

Osborne, J. L. (1998). Integrating student and peer evaluation teaching. College Teaching, 46 (1), 36-38.

Prodgers, S. B. (Ed.). (1980). Toward systematic faculty evaluation. Regional Spotlight, 13 (2). Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board. ED 181 833.

Pruitt, A. S. (1986). Colleagues as sources of evidence and evaluators of teaching performance in personnel decisions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (67th, San Francisco, CA, April, 16-20).

Quinlan, K. M. (1995). Faculty perspectives on peer review. Thought & Action, 11 (2), 5-22.

Quinlan, K. M. (1996). Involving peers in the evaluation and improvement of teaching: A menu of strategies. Innovative Higher Education, 20 (4), 299-307.

Quinlan, K., & Bernstein, D. J. (Eds.). (1996). Peer review of teaching: Symposium. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 221-307.

Rice, R. E. (1996). Making a place for the new American scholar. New Pathways: Faculty Careers and Employment for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: AAHE.

Richlin, L. and Manning, B. (1995). Improving a college/ university teaching evaluation system. Pittsburg: Alliance Publishers.

Romberg, E. (1985). Evaluating teaching in the health professions: Peers as evaluators of teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (69th, Chicago, IL, March 31-April 4). ED 254 550.

Root, L. S. (1987). Faculty evaluation: Reliability of peer assessment of research, teaching, and service. Research in Higher Education, 26 (1), 71-84.

Roworth, W.W. (1997). Pandora's dilemma: Some reflections on peer review. Academe, 83 (3), 35-38.

Rudmann, J. (1990). Guidelines and resource references for developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation and development program. ED 325 532.

Scales, A. C., & Others. (1990). University of Pennsylvania vs. EEOC and the status of peer review: A symposium. Academe, 76 (3), 31-35.

Scruggs, R. R., & Others. (1988). Evaluation of teaching performance in U.S. dental schools. Journal of Dental Education, 52 (2), 102-7.

Seldin, P. (1988). Evaluating college teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 33, 47-56.

Seldin, P. (1988). Evaluating teaching performance: Answers to common questions. AGB Reports, 30 (1), 34-39.

Seldin, P. (1980). Successful Faculty Evaluation Programs: A Practical Guide to Improve Faculty Performance and Promotion/Tenure Decisions. Crugers, NY: Coventry Press.

Seldin, P. (1997). The teaching portfolio. (Second ed.) Bolton, MA: Anker.

Seldin, P., & Associates. (1999). Changing Practices in Evaluating Teaching: A Practical Guide to Improved Faculty Performance and Promotion/Tenure Decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

Sheppard, S. L., & Others (1996). Commentary on student interviews. Innovative Higher Education, 20 (4), 271-76.

Shklov, N. (1987). Effective counseling in peer assessment of teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (Kingston, Ontario, June 22). ED 288 455.

Skoog, G. (1980). Improving college teaching through peer observation. Journal of Teacher Education, 31 (2), 23-25.

Spencer, P. A. (1992). Improving Teacher Evaluation. CA: Riverside Community College.

Spencer, P. A., & Flyr, M. L. (1992). The formal evaluation as an impetus to classroom change: Myth or reality? ED 349 053.

Strenski, E. (1995). Two cheers for peer review: Problems of definition, interpretation, and appropriate function. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6 (3), 31-49.

Sullivan, T. A. (1995). Teaching evaluation by peers. Issues. Teaching Sociology, 23 (1), 61-63.

Taylor, J. W. (1999). Lessons learned about post-tenure review from the AAHE Peer Review of Teaching Project. Innovative Higher Education, 24(1), 73-80.

Trower, C. A. (1998). Employment Practices in the Professions: Fresh Ideas from Inside and Outside the Academy. New Pathways: Faculty Career and Employment for the 21st Century Working Paper Series, Inquiry #13 . Washington, DC.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Urbach, F. (1992). Developing a teaching portfolio. College Teaching, 41 (2), 71-74.

Weimer, M. G., & Others. Instructional observation: Caveats, concerns, and ways to compensate. Studies in Higher Education, 13 (3), 285-93.

Weinbach, R. W., & Randolph, J. L. (1984). Peer review for tenure and promotion in professional schools. Improving College and University Teaching, 32 (2), 81-86.

Werner, D. L. (1984). Teaching clinical teachers. Journal of Optometric Education, 9 (4), 8-12.

Wesson, M., & Johnson, S. (1991). Post-tenure review and faculty revitalization. Academe, 77 (3), 53-57.

Wilson, R. (1998). Project seeks to help colleges use peer review to evaluate teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, A14.

Winter, M. G., & Kestner, S. G. (1990). Peer evaluation of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Dental Education, 54 (10), 626-29.

Whitman, N. A., & Cockayne, T. W. (1984). Evaluating Medical School Courses: A User-Centered Handbook. Salt Lake City, UT: School of Medicine, Utah University.

Whitman, N., & Weiss, E. (1982). Faculty evaluation: The use of explicit criteria for promotion, retention, and tenure. AAHE-ERIC/ Higher Education Research Report No. 2. ED 221 148.

Zirkel, P. A. (1985). Faculty review in the promotion and tenure process beyond the department level. Planning for Higher Education, 13 (4), 15-17.